Then the later amendments.
Then pulled statutory references.
“This is unusually messy.”
“Meaning?”
“Meaning the board may have been exercising powers without satisfying a condition required by its organizing documents.”
“What happens?”
“I need to research.”
“Could their recent enforcement actions be challenged?”
“Yes.”
“Fines?”
“Potentially.”
“Architectural decisions?”
“Potentially.”
“Annexation attempt?”
“That one had problems regardless.”
Fair.
Daria issued a written county opinion several days later.
It did not say:
Sycamore Lakes no longer exists.
It was more careful.
The association had failed to document the required reaffirmation.
That failure materially undermined its asserted enforcement authority under the charter.
Recent enforcement actions could be subject to challenge.
Residents should obtain private counsel concerning refunds, liens, and specific covenants.
That was enough.
I did not release it immediately.
Not because I wanted perfect timing for revenge.
Because my cottage was almost finished and something else had become obvious.
Most Sycamore Lakes residents still did not know me.